Review content for E-E-A-T
When you need to strengthen a piece before publish so it shows experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness.
0 views0 downloads
Dependencies
--- name: review-content-eeat description: "When you need to strengthen a piece before publish so it shows experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness." ---
Review content for E-E-A-T
Instructions
Use this skill when the user wants to review existing content for E-E-A-T gaps — e.g. YMYL or commercial pages. The job: concrete improvements so the content better signals experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trust.
Instructions
- Experience: Check for first-hand experience, case studies, or clear attribution; note where it is missing or vague.
- Expertise: Identify author credentials, citations, and depth of explanation; flag thin or unsupported claims.
- Authoritativeness: Note links to reputable sources and alignment with established guidelines; suggest specific additions.
- Trustworthiness: Flag missing dates, unclear authorship, or unsupported claims; recommend fixes (e.g. add byline, cite source, update date).
- Summary: List 3–7 concrete improvements in priority order, not generic advice.
Use case
Improving rankings for YMYL topics and building long-term brand equity and reader trust.
How to use this skill
Paste your draft article or the URL of a published page and ask for an E-E-A-T gap analysis.